Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725
The Vanity Fair piece about Mitt Romney is very interesting as it goes into detail about what Romney's leadership style was like within his power grid within the Mormon Church as well as what he was like as a leveraged buyout expert. The Dark Side of Mitt Romney | Politics | Vanity Fair
It does gives glimpses as to what kind of President he might be. |
I was told QUITE LOUDLY, IN PRIVATE MESSAGES AS WELL AS ON THIS FORUM in 2008 that Obama's relationship with Rev Wright MEANT NOTHING AND I AM MEAN FOR MENTIONING IT....I was told that if he had a relationship with communists in his youth, THAT MEANT NOTHING AND I WAS,,,,,,WELL LOTS OF THINGS....FOR EVEN MENTIONING IT.
When did the rules change on that ? I was absolutely ridiculed on here in 2008 for mentioning anything that might show anything about Obama in the WH.
TODAY, I am being criticized basically for the same thing...WHEN DID THE RULES CHANGE ON THAT ?
You mention his religion AGAIN....I was told that OBAMA s relationship with Rev Wright MEANT NOTHING about President Obama and that I better stop mentioning it.
You seem to think it is fair to always bring up religion
EXCEPT WHEN IT HAS TO WITH OBAMA..THEN IT IS NONE OF OUR BUSINESS !!!!
THIS, AND MOSTLY THIS...IS why I left the Democratic party. There are many in that party that I admire, but they actually TEACH this hateful way of discussing things (I actually posted a link to their training on race)
TELL ME WHY IT IS OK FOR YOU TO DO THIS IN "VETTING" ROMNEY, BUT IF YOU EVEN MENTIONED OR MENTION THE REV WRIGHT OR THE ASSOCIATION WITH FOLKS OF DUBIOUS CHARACTER IT IS WRONG ?
Tell me please...I want to learn from you.