Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna
Bucco, you never cease to amaze me. You only read into what is written what you want to believe. Almost never do you read in context what is written. If what is posted in any way differs from what you believe, you take umbrage, saying that the statements unfairly criticize your beliefs and the party or candidates you support.
Maybe you should slow down and read what I've written again. Actually, I've amended my original post with another example. If you want to continue to believe that anyone who doesn't embrace your years-long rant against President Obama, keep it up. It probably makes you feel better.
But if you read my posts closely, you might come to the amazing revelation that you and I will probably be voting fr the same candidate fr POTUS in November. But no doubt, for materially different reasons.
|
I read your additions and that makes more sense now. I respect you for that, and will only ask you THREE questions.....
1. I think you agree that your changes make a SUBSTANTIAL difference, especially the ACTUAL ACTIONS of the president. Why were they not part of your original post ?
2. Why go back to 2010 to show congress (both parties by the way) for what they really are ?
3. Those who came on here and lauded you so for your post....why do you think they did that when it was not totally factual ....will they be taking back their compliments ?
Again, thanks for editing your post.....it makes
A VERY BIG DIFFERENCE and you surely can criticize the Republicans anytime you want.....not my party of choice at all. My opposition is to the man in the WH who conned his way in and is lying to all of us. Even his party is beginning to fracture a bit which is shocking