Quote:
Originally Posted by janmcn
The difference in the two campaigns is President Obama raised 43% of his money from donors contributing $200 or less, while Mitt Romney only raised 10% of his money from donors contributing $200 or less.
It cost Romney 76 million dollars in the primary to defeat a serial adulterer and a former senator who lost his seat by 18 points. Money all spent on negative ads against the two. Romney never talked about his record as Governor of Massachusetts in his ads, or explained what positions he takes. He will continue to raise money from his millionaire and billionaire supporters by promising them huge tax cuts and less regulation, so they will be free to pollute the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat.
President Obama winning battle for small donors - Boston.com |
Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid
yep you just keep telling yourself good ol' boy Obama has only donations from the little people....do you really think that is close to being one half true? What about the hollywood mega thousand dollar per plate dinners?
What about the super pacs that support Obama?
It is obvious someone has bought the party smoke job. Obama has as many wealthy supporters as Romney.....don't let on anybody told you that. 
btk |
If you check the link, you will find it is the Boston Globe saying this not me.
Shouldn't they be big Romney supporters, since they are his former constituents?