Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone
Umm, no, I don't think you chalk this up on your corner. You admit that George W. had as many or more "czars" as Pres. Obama. Both presidents had these special advisors and appointed them in the same way. Downright amazing that even you understand both use them in the same way, appoint them in the same way, that you still hold onto your worn out party line that Pres. Obama's special advisors are a terrible thing.
Once again, racking Phyllis Schlafly up in your corner was a great coup. Keep it up, old buddy.
|
It all in the matter of usage. Obama's so called czars have been given true power, where Bush's were not.
I can't explain why you have difficulty in comprehending what I'm saying. You didn't have that much to drink last night.