Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna
I'm really sick and tired of your twisting or misreading anything I post here as support of Obama and criticism of Romney.
If you'll go back and read my original post, Bucco, I think you'll see that the entire point of my post was to note that huge amounts of money were flowing into the Super PAC's from foreign sources. There had been no report of any such donations to the Obama Super PAC until the one you posted today, which was dated today. Such donations don't surprise me, but they had not been reported when I wrote the original post. My original post was in response to a report on Politico.com that the Romney PAC had recieved over $10 million from sources in China. That Politico report was published about three days ago on MSNBC.
But tell me anyway, how did you somehow twist that report and question into making my intent some backhanded criticism of Mitt Romney? My criticism was of the new political process that permits elections to be manipulated with advertising purchased with foreign money. But somehow you read my posts with a pre-conceived notion of my intent.
I certainly wish that you'd somehow withhold your deep hatred and mistrust for Barack Obama in your interpretation of what I write here. I'd suggest that you read, and then maybe re-read my posts. Then, only if it is clear that I am criticizing one candidate in favor of another, feel free to be critical of my position or message. In the meantime, please stop parsing my words and twisting the message I try to convey.
|
Your comments are fair, HOWEVER, if you revisit your posts that crticize the system, without checking, I would say that in your thread opener you mention ONLY ONE CANDIDATE....very seldom is Obama held up as your example...PLEASE CHECK BACK.
That was the basis for this although I would have posted it anyway although I have doubts if anyone would have.
Hey, I do not like or respect this President, and the only combacks that contain sarcasm are those that use Romney as the example and never use Obama and I hope you are honest enough to recognize that.
I have posted retorts to some of your congressional posts where you ONLY use the house as an example...NEVER the senate. WE AGREE on the inept government, but I try (maybe not always successful, but I try) to include BOTH PARTIES which was the first phrase of your note, and then (and I didnt check by count) but then 3/4 of the post was a specific by name and group of a Romney donation.
I might also add that am sure you are "sick and tired" of me mentioning that....I can say that your lectures on not criticizing Obama because I will not change votes rings hollow since those on here who simply jump in and out with the condescending name calling of anything right (candidates, networks, etc) are never called to task by you. By implication to me, that is because you condone their posts that are normally without any credibility or link to even try to make the statments credible. Mine are based on what I have read and see and are linked to validate. THAT fact does not make them wrong in anyway, but my problem is they do not ever receive your condemnations, and in fact, many times get the "applause".
I agree totally our government is screwed up, and will support anyone who says it, but to be frank, I feell forced to defend Republicans because when the congress is discussed it appears they are the only bad guys, yet when I read of the actions of the Senate that seems to go by with no comment.
I am truely sorry if this made you angry, but your called me out on this forum in a
very very public manner simply because you felt I was criticizing Obama too much and would never change a mind....I suggest you could say the same thing to others who adore him, but you will not.
If I misread you I am sorry...I DO apologize when necessary but ask that you check on the accuracy of what I say at the same time.