Quote:
Originally Posted by ijusluvit
Ah, more critical info! I knew the CBO projections did not include the entire balance sheet of costs and revenues, but not that the CBO was actually limited to such a partisan view of real final costs. This takes even more wind out of the ACA critics' sails.
Again, Bucco et al. Kindly and respectfully, we have heard you continually restating your wholesale conclusion that ACA should be repealed. We've also heard enough about the Obama-led cabal which is to blame in myriad ways for this travesty.
Please, please, let's move on. Let's concentrate on any specific provisions, find any evidence that they are net negatives, and why they need to be seriously revised or dropped from the plan.
|
Just to correct you, as you seem to assume a lot about me, I NEVER posted nor uttered the words about repealing the law. NOT ONCE.
I cannot back away from Obama being responsible although he, himself is distancing from it, but I have said numerous times on this forum, the only positive from his campaign, FOR ME, was his promises on healthcare. Although he just dropped most of what he said, there are enough good things, in my opinion to save it perhaps.
And I suggest you read the bill funding a bit more closely....it is STILL filled with so many IFS...ANDS and MAYBES and financed so far in the future it is just scary to me because if you read it, much of the stuff used to pay for the bill just aint gonna happen