Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - How About Some "Certainty"?
View Single Post
 
Old 07-10-2012, 08:10 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna View Post
Will the extension of the Bush tax cuts as is really help the economy? If the top 1-2% are taxed more while 98-99% of taxpayers get a cut, how will that effect things? I think everyone agrees that a broad tax increase that would result from the sunsetting of the Bush cuts would be bad at this state of the economy.

Almost all the experts say that "certainty" in the tax code and regulatory environment is what's needed to spur economic growth. How many politicians, particularly Republicans, have you heard making soundbites about the lack of certainty slowing economic growth? Growth sure isn't being limited by a lack of capital--American corporations are sitting on over $2 trillion in cash. In fact, one might wonder if further cutting the taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations paying too little in taxes (one-third of the Fortune 500 pay no federal income taxes!), how letting them accumulate even more cash will entice them to invest it? Good question, huh? If they're investing anywhere these days, it's overseas.

But all Congress is arguing about is a temporary extension of the Bush tax cuts. Let's see, those tax rates have been "temporary" for what, 11-12 years now? And Congress wants to extend them once again to give them time to consider permanent legislation? Gee-suz, that's longer than it took us to put a man on the moon after John Kennedy said that we would!

So who's saying anything about certainty? About a broad look at tax reform? About a broad look at reglatory reform? When the first Congressional joint committee or commission is appointed to do anything but extend the patchwork, Rube Goldberg set of economic legislation, maybe just maybe I'll have some hope. Listen carefully...anyone heard a member of Congress talking of such things?

No, I didn't think so.
In reference to those "particularly Republicans" you seem to always have this problem in finding this stuff...now, on the other side you will have a problem however...

"Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio). (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)According to Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), that question misses the point.

In a speech to the Associated Builders and Contractors legislative conference in Washington on Tuesday, Portman said that the debate ought to be focused on comprehensive tax reform rather than on the Bush-era tax cuts.

The speech came as President Obama, speaking at a campaign event in Iowa, renewed his call for Congress to extend the tax cuts on income of $250,000 and less.

“Look, I think we ought to reform the whole tax code,” Portman said, according to a transcript of the speech. “We shouldn’t be debating whether to deal with the current code by allowing it to be extended or not. We should have a president who shows leadership and comes to Congress and says: ‘You know what? We need to reform this whole tax code.’ ”


Rob Portman: Comprehensive tax reform, not Bush-era tax cuts, should be focus of debate - The Washington Post

I would also maybe ask you to review the RYAN PLAN, which is not perfect but actually calls for what you say the Republicans do not discuss. It, with a lot of other things DEAD IN THE SENATE !