[skip0358]

Originally Posted by Patty55

(Pulling on my flame suit here)

If Happinow paid for an unobstructive view, then she has a complaint, but what exactly is her problem?

She mentions electric fencing, maybe the reason for the shrubs is so the dogs will have a sight line that they will "respect" as a fence rather than just run till they are zapped. What would she have them do, count strides?

She also mentions the guy drives a "red vet", unless he has a former Communist army member pulling him in a rickshaw I think he has a red corvette-who cares. He's rude to his help, again unless she's taking up house cleaning, this should not be her problem.

This guy is planting landscaping ON HIS OWN PROPERTY, his dog is in his own house, he will be running without a leash IN HIS OWN BACKYARD (is their now a leash-law prohibiting this).

As far as having a decent relationship with your neighbors, I think that ship has sailed. Look at the bright side, you're getting some free landscaping.

Yes there is a no leash law. And you CAN plant but not to form a hedge between homesites and not in excess of 4" high and not in the swail line or within a certain distance of the property line. Yes it is getting a little crazy. The right thing was done by happinow,the proper agency was notified and when the work starts someone will come to the property. Far to many restriction are being stretched or ignored completly. Good luck Happinow.