I love how some of you supporters will take one single line from another post, then turn around and make it into something they would have others believe was said.

I specifically stated (I know specifics are very hard for some to deal with!!!) WPA had a requirement for participants to work to get paid. I made the statement to support my non support today of the Obama game playing with people on welfare by eliminating the requirement to have to work to get paid.

Nice try once again to take something I said and turn it into something you would others to think I said. Ans as I have said many, many times before you are entitled to your opinion, however you are not entitled to change my statements or my intents. Fortunately many who frequent this forum know your style and disregard your partisan snipping.

By the way, as usual you did not answer the question posed....typical off message distraction first and always.

How about answering the question? Do you support the federal government handing out money to those who choose not to work? And why?

The first part requires only a simple yes or no. The second part is license to tout your position.

btk