The difference between our views is clear. I am concerned about the killing of anyone and feel we should work on reducing killings wherever these killings occur. You, on the other hand are not concerned with the killing of innocent people who cannot afford to move out of the inner city. It's only when the people you consider 'normal', certainly no those untouchables living in the inner cities, are involved that you become concerned.

Please tell us which people you consider to be 'normal' and their lives worth something and which ones are not worth bothering with. It's a legitimate question that progressives starting with Woodrow Wilson had no problem answering. You, Buggy, Dale etc have identified yourselves are progressives. What is your answer to this question?