the task seems to be how to blame charge some one with killing but not offend them or their race or their religion. Hence the use of that disgusting terminology political correctness (


...happens every time!!) so as to not offend ANYONE or ANY GROUP.
And of course we all know that is nothing more than a license to do or say anything that is not wrong or right. For those of us fortunate enough to not be personally involved in the loss of a loved one in these KILLINGS it is oh so very easy to arm chair intellectualize and sanitize the incident.
It is so much easier to just face the facts.
Was he in the military? Yes.
Had he been disparaging the US government prior to the KILLINGS? yes.
Is he a Muslim? yes.
Was he shouting the Muslim praises to allah while KILLING? yes.
Was he connected to Muslim extremists? yes.
The conclusion is obvious for many of us. Then when the KILLERS lawyers get involved and do more sanitizing and what they are famous for using or hiding behind the letter of the law....their job is to create doubt....not address guilt or innocence. Then the media will pick up on the lawyers track and assist the KILLER by sensationalizing the means of the KILLING as in go after the GUN aspect.
No discipline...too much permissiveness...and far too much tolerance for doing wrong....the watering down of America's values.
Yes or no....right or wrong....pretty simple concepts not very often employed by lawyers, the media and the supporters.
What is encouraging however is more and more juries are starting to get the message...like the Sandusky jury!! So there is some upside in letting real thinking Americans have the say!!
btk