Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefoot
I'm missing something here. Assuming the neighbour has an approval permit from the ARC and is adhering to existing restrictions, you're going to threaten the neighbour and the ARC beforehand, by serving them with "legal proper notice", to ensure compliance?
Boy Howdy.
|
Girl Howdy, yes you're missing my point, this would not be an approach after compliance.
here is was stated
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happinow
Our new neighbors, as we speak, have landscapers on their property, plotting out their landscaping. They have been talking to the landscapers about putting in bushes/hedges all around their property to make sure the dogs stay on their property. They have mapped it out with the paint...
suggest talking to them.....we already did but they are in the mindset that the rules don't apply to them.
|
The fact is the day it was recognized with a landscaper and paint lines then thereafter a talk resulting saying the rules don't apply.
That's when the notices go out, U don't need a lawyer to send letters, just write out the facts and your understanding of the code to the neighbor, ARC and the developer perhaps.
If you don't complain it appears that u have no objection or acquiesce to the project. Hard to argue your position after the fact.
No matter how arrogant he may have appeared at the time he was asked he knows you're not going to let him violate the code and your rights as a secondary beneficiary of those codes.
Yes he can anything on his property within the code, but can't violate that code.
We drank the kool aid thinking that there were rules, codes and guidelines in place to insure quit enjoyment.
That make sense?
.