Originally Posted by billethkid

"knowing" is a relative term.

What each of us "knows" is relative to each individual....I am quite content (some prefer to call it naieve or whatever) in what I know about Mitt Romney as a candidate and his morals VS Barrack Obama's morals as a candidate and POTUS for the last 4 years.

I know as much as anybody else does that does not rely only on the media for input and knowledge.

As far as quoting John Edwards as an example you only underscore that for most politicians it really does not matter what their morals are....until they get caught.

What I "know" tells me Romney is the far better man. When I aquire any new information that may affect what I know, I will take that into consideration.

No different than the litany of defenders of Obama who supposedly "know" him.

Remember the advantage of Romney his background is non political, hence by what we all "know" that means he certainly is more credible than most political incumbents.

btk