Quote:
Originally Posted by ijusluvit
A supertanker boatload of outrageously exaggerated generalizations!!
Bucco, this is the verbatim stuff you've been challenged on, point-by-point in the past. You later admitted it was either overstated or not what you really meant, (my words/your meaning). Now you dredge it up again.  |
I suppose it must be my old age, but I sure do not recall what you are saying...I certainly have said it over and over but do not recall any rebutall.
1. EVERYONE agreed that health costs were a problem when Obama made his proposal.
2. We were promised an open debate, transparency, a law that addressed health costs, and tort reform and we got none of that
3. He had to give "payoffs" (I will admit that payoff is my word) to LA and SC to even have it passed under a obscure rule in the senate.
4. We have a health law that does not address health care costs in any way nor tort reform.
5. We have a law where the cost is rising so fast it is close to double the original in 2010
Which is untrue and I assure you when shown the light I will stop talking about it...which of those items is not true ?
I have posted this many times, and yes I recall you challenging me and I wrote a lengthy response on which you never responded; I will attempt to locate that thread
Actually I did find it....post #25 on the thread
WHO'S GOING TO PAY was my response to your challenge and you never responded to that.
Here is a link I hope.
Who's Going To Pay?