[njbchbum]

Originally Posted by rubicon

mikeod: spot on...that was my concern. Obviously this is an argument between the Developer's Home Sales Unit vis a vis other Realtors. I would suggest there is a solution to their dispute. However to drag district 1-4 and there was mention of District 5 into this fray and to challenge Deed Restritions, et is a vey dangerous game.

I have not been a big fan of the Developer from the standpoint of a consumer because of the monopoly he holds in Sumter County . As I have said it is good to be the king and as such I looked forward to when he stepped down.

However after the AAC decision concerning this issue it gives me reason to pause and wonder if perhaps we are better having the king.

Finally as I recall a member took a poll on this very issue on another thread and the overwhelming majority wanted the restriction on signage to stay in place.

Ciao All (tha't what Southern Italians say Y'all)

rubicon/mike -
1] do either of you reside or own property in the villages cdds 1-5 and/or in lady lake/lake county villages? if not, why do you even care or are you concerned about the signage issue in those areas.
2] does the aac make decisions that impact your cdd in the villages?
3] are either of you concerned that after the developer turns governance over to your cdd, that he can come in and just change your deed restrictions?
4] re the poll - unless the poll was restricted to impacted members, it has no bearing on the impacted residents and villages - does it?