You folks do know that I linked a NY Times article to read in advance which I assume is sort of in the same vein.

Of course I know the bias of writers, but you either read it or just do not have an idea. I am a big boy; Unlike, it appears most on here, I actually read both sides of issues and make my OWN decision.

People on here, and this may sound judgemental but can only make my judgment based on what I read....if they are liberals, the go to nothing but liberal sites to cut and paste anything bad about a Republican. Same applies to all the tweets they get from sites like that...ever notice in some cases that the post is short and just about the size of a tweet ! Anyway, that to me besides being very shallow cannot be very stimulating nor can you learn anything at all. Now, that would bother me because I do not like people to tell me how to think and that is what they are doing. I also wonder how they feel when they vote and know deep down the know nothing except what one side told them ! I have no preconceived notions..whatever I say, it is because I have investigated it.

Am I right always...heck no..not even close but when confronted with a logical counter arguement (very few of them on this forum) I can say I was wrong. I have done that a few times on here.

I invite you to read the Times piece. Folks who know how I feel on some things probably think it is anti Obama...it is anything but. Of course I know that Woodward will err, if he errs on that side, but there are other sources to investigate before making any decisions.