Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages PL
We are in total agreement on that. I wouldn't want property values dragged down either.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I like TV and the deed restrictions. I'm just wondering if there is any fundamental difference between a proposed 4 ounce soda restriction in N.Y.C. and any other restriction that one might find in The Villages, or anywhere else for that matter.
It seems to me that a restriction is a restriction as long as it doesn't violate any human rights. If someone went to court over a soda restriction, in what way could they claim to be damaged?
|
No problem. I'm cool.
There probably isn't much of a difference but they are similar in that when you look at the big picture, it's a minor inconvenience. If it bothered someone that much, then they should consider living wherever a major annoyance.
Like you say, if it doesn't violate someone's civil rights.
The condo I lived in had a board member who wanted to insert a condition in the condo by-laws that people with a certain amount of kids couldnt live in our complex. He was quickly showed the error of his ways as that was a violation of civil rights and was voted down. TV has the 80/20 rule so it doesn't violate anyone one person's rights.
The mayor of N.Y. had his hands slapped by the courts. nuff said,,,,,,
__________________
"It doesn't cost "nuttin", to be nice". MOM
I just want to do the right thing! Uncle Joe, (my hero).