Quote:
Originally Posted by jandbrare
It is a misunderstanding to gather that the POA is "...being held as the entity unwilling to do anything." I only intended that the POA be recognized as agreeing with the ACC as they illustrated by their response to the letter to the editor of the POA bulletin, which I quoted in the initial post.
Jerry Lester
|
Which means what exactly?
Is the ACC the entity that has to initiate any permits and/or mitigation?
Who would pay for the engineering study and/or any subsequent work?
And even if the POA agrees with the ACC and doesn't see the need....where is the developer and VHA on this issue?
In your original post, you said....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jandbrare
"I prefer to think of it as a comment on the bias of the POA."
|
One can only conclude, that you must be biased against the POA.
.