[jandbrare]

Originally Posted by OnTrack

OK, I think I'm now getting a clearer picture of what is really going on here.


Clarity comes from understanding the agenda (hidden or otherwise).

I believe you made yours pretty clear, when trying to dismiss the POA's position/opinion in your original post...

In other words, your first post seemed to try and destroy any credibility the POA has....solely because they may have confused which Water District is involved.



My question is, who "controls" the AAC? As I understand it, they are a separate entity. Or are you saying that the POA has the ability to direct the AAC's actions?



Where does the AAC get its funding?



So you are saying that the POA, by not opposing the AAC's position, should get all the blame for nothing being done....and not the VHA or developer?

Help me out here and explain why you haven't taken the VHA to task....for not addressing it either?

Or is it because there is still animosity, that the AAC was formed as a result of the Lawsuit Settlement in early 2008 (in which the developer obviously lost)?



Once again, I'm confused as to the authority the POA has over the AAC...and why the other owners association isn't commenting on it either.




Since we haven't heard any comments about the VHA's role in this....how do you feel about them?



You mentioned above that you "don't have a dog in this fight," but it really seems that your intention is to lay the blame of the AAC's inaction...solely on the shoulders of the POA.

Please explain how I am wrong on that.


.

1. "In other words, your first post seemed to try and destroy any credibility the POA has....solely because they may have confused which Water District is involved." Not at all. It was because their statement implied that they had insight as to how the Water District would respond, but they didn't even know which Water district was cognizant. They were implying that they had insight which they couldn't have had.
   
2. "My question is, who "controls" the AAC? As I understand it, they are a separate entity. Or are you saying that the POA has the ability to direct the AAC's actions?" Not at all. The POA is a separate organization.
   
3. "Where does the AAC get its funding?" As you probably know, the AAC gets its funding from the lawsuit the POA raised.
   
4. "So you are saying that the POA, by not opposing the AAC's position, should get all the blame for nothing being done....and not the VHA or developer?" How on earth did you deduce that? The VHA or Developer has not been involved, to my knowledge.
   
5. "Help me out here and explain why you haven't taken the VHA to task....for not addressing it either?" My post was directed to the POA response in their newsletter. I have no issue with the VHA or the Developer. My post was specifically directed to the POA Editorial response.
   
6. "Or is it because there is still animosity, that the AAC was formed as a result of the Lawsuit Settlement in early 2008 (in which the developer obviously lost)?" There, I was pretty sure you were asking questions to which you already knew the answer. Why?
   
7. "Since we haven't heard any comments about the VHA's role in this....how do you feel about them?" The VHA? They serve a purpose, too.
   
8. "You mentioned above that you "don't have a dog in this fight," but it really seems that your intention is to lay the blame of the AAC's inaction...solely on the shoulders of the POA." How could you possibly conclude that from what I've said. I think the POA has been duped, but the inaction is that of the AAC.

Thanks for your post. I hope my response has cleared up my purpose for posting.

Jerry Lester