I have NO problem with the "Historic Side". My posting was simply to point out that:
- As shown in the pictures of this lake, it has ALWAYS suffered from seasonal / rain fall driven VAST fluctuations in water level.
- That any possible "cure" would be very expensive.
I would feel EXACTLY the same way if Paradise Lake was south of 466 or in my back yard.
Your problem is not with me and my opinion .... it is with the ACC, it's position on this issue and it would appear your own neighbors. I will admit I am not sure of the nature of serving on the ACC but if they are elected positions, I suggest you work to having member elected that are aligned with your position on Paradise Lake. Further, If you think that the will of the people has changed, as the previously rejected an offer by "the developer" to do the work on their nickle, then you need to mount a grassroots campaign to show that they now support this project.
|