Quote:
Originally Posted by Maryland Girl
It doesn't matter what I would think. It would only matter what I did. Yes, the testimony regarding Mr. Martin's 'cracker' comment was testified to by Rachel Jeantel, so it is in the record and considered evidence. It doesn't matter what Mr. Martin thought. It only matters what Mr. Martin did. If he sucker punched Mr. Zimmerman then Mr. Zimmerman, believing his life was threatened, had a right to use deadly force.
'He was obviously worried about the cracker following him.' Where is the evidence to support this? We know he was aware of Mr. Zimmerman but whether he was 'worried' about him is speculation. By the way, do you think people should be referred to as cracker? If so, then your opinions are more understandable. The jury will decide based on evidence given at trial.
|
It is in the record now, but when Zimmerman was following him he had no idea of it. Like I said if it was a black dude following you in the dark you would be concerned. Why isn't you cannot agree that Martin could feel the same way.