Quote:
Originally Posted by NJblue
I disagree that following a suspicious person is a "clear sign of aggression", but for the sake of discussion, let's say it was. Does that level of "aggression" give the other person a right to pummel him? Does Zimmerman forfeit his right to self defense because of the "aggressive" act of following someone?
|
I didnt say his right of self defense was compromised. Where did you see that on my post? And it has already been established that he wasn't "pummeled ". If I was a teenaged kid and was being followed by a creepy guy, which his friend says Martin told her, I'd be scared and would consider Zimmerman a threat.