Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone
Anyhow, profiling people based on gold dental jewelry and a twitter name is over the top.
How about sticking to the evidence presented at the trial since that is what the jury will be looking at for their verdict?
I saw a few minutes of FOX NOISE  today and one of their "expert legal analysts" predicted that after both sides present their case, the judge will toss it out of court saying there was no evidence that was presented by the prosecutor. He also predicted the prosecutor will be charged with "presecutorial misconduct". FAIR AND BALANCED!  |
Those are OPINIONS, that is all. At least Fox attempts report the facts and provides opinions on BOTH sides of most issues unlike the mainstream media which serve ONLY as propaganda organs. By the way, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz known as one of the nation's most outstanding civil rights advocates based on his assessment of the evidence believes Zimmerman should never have been brought to trial. The prosecutor Angela Corey threatened to sue Harvard but he refused to retract his statement. She is a mess! Look at her record. This whole thing is driven by political ambition and pressure form the usual assortment of race baiters and the agendas of extremist groups.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-d...b_1571942.html
http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2...xpayer-dollars
By the way, how could Zimmerman have profiled Martin on his twitter name or have noticed Martin's teeth prior to calling 911 about Martin, whom he had seen only at some distance? From the 911 transcript Zimmerman was not initially certain of Martin's race.