Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucco
I find it totally amazing and scary how correct you are.
These folks have been pulled into this by outside political influences.....minds were made up before any trial, and WILL NOT be changed no matter the evidence. These folks are stretching things so badly, it is scary.
THIS IS 100 PERCENT POLITICAL...period and end of that story.
All this discussion of evidence or lack there of is just an excuse to exercise your typing skills.
NOBODY seems to remember the genesis of this case at all. NOBODY cares about the main players and their history in these type of cases.
People are on here flapping about as if the evidence of lack thereoff really meant anything. Only thing that counts is your political view.....and that is it.
Alan Dershowitz, and most other legal scholars felt no charges were should have been leveled, and that by itself MEANS NOTHING. But the only reason this is even in trial is because of the 30 days after the tragic incident had everyone up to the White House commenting on it as a result of the immediate attempt to get the media involved. If you read the history of this incident, THAT is what you find.
Oh yeah....this is 100% political including the threats of riots should they allow the terrible Zimmerman to go free (NOT any comment intended to promote guilt or innocence because I do not care...JUSTICE is all I ever care about).
This is a total fiasco rooted in things we all are aware of but never want to talk about. Sharpton has done the EXACT SAME THING in his past......along with all the major players involved with DISASTEROUS RESULTS. BUT we go along, I suppose because our inside political machine tells us we need to.
Still waiting for one of the soft hearted folks on here grieving about the young man to start a thread about the 19 firefighters killed in Arizona. THAT however has no political implications thus it does not get anyone's time.
|
Sorry, but I do not see that the trial itself is political. The fact that it came to trial, perhaps. Political motivation or not, it is in trial and that is a fact.
I have only posted my
personal opinions and observations, not the political or media hype. I just think that GZ had no right to appoint himself judge, jury, and executioner that night.
Getting out of his car and then not following the advice of the dispatcher was not his big mistake. He could have met them at his car, as he originally said he would, and then taken them up the path indicating where he last saw him.
Not adhering to NW protocol was his big mistake. Technically, everyone is a member of NW whether they patrol or have a title. They are to be observant and call the authorities to report anything they have a concern about.
Call law enforcement and report.. That is what is posted on the sign and what was emphasized in the meetings when their NW was established. The were never instructed to take matters into their own hands. Our CW follow the same guidelines. They have no legal authority just as GZ did not.
I have heard him on the tapes and his interview tell lie after lie. So have the jurors. I still say that will carry a great deal of weight with these jurors.
As for the riots, there are idiots in all walks of life. Remember all the demonstrations outside the Anthony house all hours of the day and night which included bringing young children with them? Talk about bad parenting!