
07-05-2013, 06:36 AM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Villages North
Posts: 4,269
Thanks: 1,210
Thanked 1,038 Times in 372 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickey100
I see nothing wrong with a 17 year old kid going out at 7:30 at night to take a short walk to the store to buy skittles. I must be a horrible parent. Sue me. The fact is there is nothing illegal or criminal about what he was doing. It matters not who's apartment it was, who's wife or girlfriend it was. It matters not where he had A's in school had a run-in with the law a few months ago, or if he posted rapper type poses on his Facebook page, which by the way, is very common among young men today and doesn't mean they are criminals. The bottom line was - did he do something that particular night that a reasonable person in George Zimmerman’s situation would have suspected Trayvon intended to burglarize someone’s home or steal someone’s property. Walking through the neighborhood when it is raining and looking at houses does not suggest criminal activity. You can't just have a "hunch" that someone has criminal activity in mind, there has to be probable cause, which there wasn't in this case. If Zimm had been a police officer he would have stopped Martin, and identified himself as a police officer and asked him what he was doing in the neighborhood, or just asked if he needed assistance. Zimm did neither of those things. In fact Zimm acted as the aggressor when he followed Martin with a loaded weapon. Since Zimm was the aggressor, how about allowing Martin the right to Stand his Groundand defend himself against Zimm ?
|
Excellent post and thank you for your commonsense response after all the nonsense we have seen posted here.
__________________
A people free to choose will always choose peace.
Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about!
Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak
|