Quote:
Originally Posted by zonerboy
Why can't we judge the article by what it has to say, the perspectives it presents, the ideas it expresses, instead of by who wrote it ?
Professional writer or not, what difference does it make?
Are his points sound? If you think not, then state why you think they are lacking. Sound reasoning will shine through despite mediocre writing skills.
This article appears to have been written before the jury verdict was in. It does not discuss wether or not Zimmerman was guilty of second degree murder. It does not argue who threw the first punch. It deals with deeper, more fundamental issues.
|
1. If the intent is to embarass me in some way, it aint gonna happen.
2. IT DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE.....first of all TOTV rules do not allow a post to be entirely someone elses "work". The OP never once made a comment or allowed why it was posted...WHAT POINT TO BE MADE ?????
3. I took this as a flamer post...no personal thoughts....a lifted piece of literary and then leave. Set on emotions and no personal thoughts.
And by the way...the headline was ZIMMERMAN so it was about the ZIMMERMAN trial with no valid points being made.
Every post I have made on here as allowed for me understanding but not tolerant of flamers or plagerizers or anything close.