Quote:
Originally Posted by mickey100
That "apology" is really telling. He takes no personal responsibility, just says he's "sorry for the loss of your son", and that he's sorry for them that their son is gone. That ties in with his previous statement on the Fox news show “I feel that it was all God’s plan, and for me to second-guess it or judge it ... ” .
|
That 'apology' to me was very telling that day when the bond hearing was televised. On the released tape, he told the NEN operator that he appeared to be in his teens, late teens, and then tells the family that he thought their son was just a little bit younger than himself. This man was 28 at the time and that is pretty far removed from being a teenager. To me, that is not an inconsistency but an outright lie.
I wondered during the trial, why this was not entered into evidence with the other tapes. Seems to me they left out way too many things and concentrated too much on his getting out of his car, etc. Getting out of your car is not illegal. Lying under oath is.