Quote:
Originally Posted by mickey100
There is a difference between "no" evidence and "not enough" evidence to convict. She is not being irresponsible, she is being honest..
|
There is also a big difference between saying (as the juror), "There was not enough evidence to convict him" or "there was reasonable doubt as to whether he was guilty".......and
"He got away with murder".
By saying "he got away with murder", she is making herself the prosecution, judge and jury.
I don't think she honors the high calling of a juror, and the need to leave the "convictions" to the justice system in the court room.
And I think she is looking for gigs on TV talk shows and for book deals, with Sharpton, Jackson and all the others peddling this tabloid version of courtroom justice and making a living off the increasing racial tensions this throws fuel on.