I say do not "go in". It will be another Iraq.
I support sending in missles to take out any and all supply routes to and from suspected gas stockpile areas. Cripple railways and highways.
Neutralize the airbases that have planes that support the civil war.
And then get out of the way and let them do their thing as they have been for hundreds of years.
For those who favor "going in" or boots on the ground what would be the objective? Democracy? As in Afghanistan and Iraq? I hardly think so.
The only real objective, the one our allies are stating....punish Syria for using chemical weapons on it's own people. There is no need for anything else.
NO BOOTS ON THE FROUND. NONE! NO FINANCIAL AID (you know the old saying of go to war with the USA and loose (then become another country sapping our dollars).
We need to be disengaging the middle east....not getting in deeper.
btk
|