[graciegirl]

The recreation department now owns it. It was bought by the AAC which was formed as a result of the law suit against the developer which was brought by Elaine Dreidame and two lawyers from the POA?

So..If the AAC wasn't formed...and things would be run like they are south of 466 then who would say what would happen in that building?

The recreation department runs all of the rec centers but they don't do restaurants, is that what I am hearing?

But people still want it to be a restaurant, even though the last one failed? It seems that there are a lot of different opinions as to why it failed.

Some will always say it is the developers fault no matter what. The same people will say it over and over. I learned this morning that someone who hasn't even moved here yet wants to make clear she is NOT on the side of the developer. As I pointed out before, more times than not, you can sort of tell which side of the aisle people sit on by how they feel about the developer. That's o.k. with me. It just took a while to figure it out..

The truth is...I don't understand the issue at all. I don't understand the AAC at all. I don't understand WHO would run the restaurant, hire the cooks, the staff, pay the bills, establish the menu..if it is going to be run by the recreation department, with no experience in running restaurants.

Doesn't seem like a plan that is headed for success.

Or am I missing something really big here?