Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Obama to seek congressional approval on Syria
View Single Post
 
Old 09-01-2013, 10:08 AM
Kelsie52's Avatar
Kelsie52 Kelsie52 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buttonwood Heights
Posts: 447
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by l2ridehd View Post
Lets try to understand the problem. Obama drew a line in the sand and said chemical weapons would result in harsh consequences. Probably a mistake, but he said it and that is now behind us. Ashad used chemical weapons to kill his own people, including women and children. Do we want to accept that? I agree this is a no win conflict, but should we act or not? Obama now wants a get out of jail card. He saw what happened in the UK Parliament. So the British PM is off the hook. Maybe he wants the same out.

Now the problem. Syria is watching to see if we act. If we don't, they will continue until they murder thousands. Iran is watching and seeing if our "red line in the sand" is real so they can do what they want with regard to nuclear weapons. Israel is watching to see if we act so they know what to do about Iran. If we do anything it is a losers game. If we do nothing, how do you think Israel will act to take out Iran's nuclear capability? Think they will react the same way if we don't act against Syria? I believe they will think our "we got your back" policy is worthless and decide they need to eliminate the Iran threat now. Don't think North Korea is not watching either. Syria is not the real problem. It's all the other countries who are taking our measure and making decisions that have a much more significant impact on the future.

It's amateur hour in Washington and Obama has painted himself into a corner where what ever he does is wrong. He is hoping by putting Congress in the middle there will be someone else to blame for the failed outcome. And any decision is actually a failure. So this is a true lose lose.

We should never have gotten to where we are, but unfortunately we are there. There is no good answer.

You hit the nail on the head . He made a statement about the red line and knew it was not true . He was trying to talk tough on foreign policy. He does have the power for the strike but didnt take it because he wanted the Congress and the American people to be part of it !!! are you kidding!!
The President does not want to strike (and I agree with that --we do not belong there )


He didnt wait for anyone when he decided to not enforce laws concerning illegals he does not listen to Congress or the American people when we ask for answers about Bengazi, IRS or fast and furious.

He sees this decision as putting himself in a winning situtation --If no strike is voted by Congress he can say he wanted to but they got in the way again --if they vote to strike and it goes wrong --Congress agreed --If it works out well --"I did it"

This President will go down in history with famos phrases of other before him : We have nothing to fear but fear itself ,Ask not what you country can do for you but ask what you can do for your country .

His will be : You can keep your Doctor and you rates will go down.

In case anyone is monitoring our internet posts ,,This is my humble opinion --I still think that is legal....
__________________
Arrived Buttonwood in Oct 2010