Quote:
Originally Posted by SpicyCajunPugs
I'm confused. I did answer it in post 59 and you responded in post 60. I have no personal connection, but I follwed and researched the case and trial extensively because of I am a paralegal who once attended law school and I was very curious how the case would turn out. Let me make it clear that I never have said George, O.J., or Casey were innocent, I just said that our jury system determined the State didn't prove their guilt. That is our justice system. I for one think their are many scumbags who get off unfairly, but because there are very few people who are convicted that are innocent (especially with DNA proof), I still think it is a great system. I would just want to die if a loved one of mine was unfairly convicted of a crime he didn't commit because people didn't like him or tried to frame him with only circumstantial evidence. How would you all feel about that?
|
MAN, why do they always backpaddle? I guess the answer is NO JOB.
I'm sure that as a paralegal you are aware that the courts do not judge anyone "innocent" and that innocent is not the same as "not guilty", but that is not the issue here. My question was "Do they work? Have they ever?" Thank you for your roundabout answer.
__________________

Loving life in the Village of PattyLand
Y'know that part of your brain that tells you "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!" I think I'm missing it.