[jebartle]

Originally Posted by mikeod

I agree with the posts supporting the current system governing the community. It's not broken. We don't need to fix it.

However, there is an aspect of the original post that should be considered. That is to remain interested and informed about what is going on here.

And that leads me to one area I thnk the developer has an opportunity, if not an obligation, to improve. Communication. I don't think I have any right to expect them to provide information on their development plans down the road, whether it be the Fruitland Park property or property south of 44, or anywhere else. However, when they are involved in changes to existing buildings or properties or facilities, I believe they could be more forthcoming with information if it affects the residents. Examples are everywhere. What were the real reasons the buffalo were removed? More recently, the architectural plans for the Church on the Square obviously are complete as construction has begun. What would be the downside of letting the residents know how it will look when completed and what is the prospect of resuming the Sunday services there when it is done? Same questions for Orange Blossom Hiils. These are things that affect residents' lives and enjoyment of the community. Letting us know doesn't mean giving us input, but it does cut down on the rumors that are not usually complimentary to the developer's efforts. And it would reduce the angst involving changes.