I was watching "Judge Judy" on TV a while ago and she heard a similar case where a property owner was suing a golfer for damage done to a window on his house. Judge Judy also concluded that a home owner on a golf course assumes the risk and liabilities of errant golf balls and the damage they do to their property. If the golfer intentionally teed up and shot directly at the house, then it is an act of vandalism.
__________________
Always keep your words soft and sweet,
just in case you have to eat them!
|