Quote:
Originally Posted by jbdlfan
Let's see.....eye-witness accounts(two) of a person being arrested at a pool with what appeared to be drugs on the hood of a police vehicle. This all after eye-witness accounts of "suspicious" activity by the individual arrested.(I say suspicious because there are some on this board that will dispute this information) Now this type of post is considered unreliable because more specific details have not yet been provided. (who, what, when, where-by the way, that's what journalists are PAID for) I'm surprised anybody EVER post anything they see. Please people, ignore some of this and continue to post what you see. Some of us trust your assessment....
|
You know jbdifan, if you read every post on this thread I don't see a one questioning the credibility of the OP. just asking further questions about what happened. There are three or four that say that the OP was badly treated, but people were responding to this very interesting bit of information wanting to know more. That is just natural. Now later, two more people who did know more have added to the information, so we have a little better idea of what happened. Some know the person arrested well enough to know she was on her driveway after this happened, but we don't know her. We don't go to that pool and that is the reason we are curious. There isn't any thing wrong with that. I don't see why people get upset when further information is requested. The folks taking issue with our questions seem to be the folks who know what happened. But we don't know other than some woman got arrested at some pool. Now we know the Sanibel pool.