Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Kiefer
The bottom line in these comments is the fact that Janet Tutt owes her job to the developer. The following are the simple facts, the central district boards employ Janet Tutt. The central district board members are elected by a single property owner, that being the only property owner, the developer. The operating funds of the central districts come from from the residents. Janet Tutt is paid from these funds. Janet Tutt receives her salary from the Residents, she owes her employment to the central district boards who are 100% controlled by the developer. If push comes to shove, do you think Janet Tutt would take a adversary role opposing the developer?? You make up your own mind if this is a healthy arrangement for the residents ????
|
Everything you say is clearly correct, and it is not a healthy arrangement for the residents.
However, to her credit, Ms. Tutt has probably done as well as anybody could in coping with the inherent conflicts of interest that arise from time to time in her job. But she can never cross the developer. Again, thank goodness for the POA since we have no official who will represent our interests when they conflict with those of the Developer, as they have from time to time in the past and will probably from time to time do so in the future.