Quote:
Originally Posted by mickey100
Acting in the Developer's interest is not an implication that she doesn't do a good job. That is a misinterpretation on someone's part.
No one is condemning her or implying anything negative regarding her work skills. As mentioned numerous times, she is doing a good job given the framework she has to work within.
But, for the last time - the point of my post, is that I would prefer to have a manager that is not tied to the Developer. The Developer pays her salary. When the interests of the Developer and residents coincide, all will be well. When they don't, Ms. Tutt can make a recommendation in the residents' favor, but the Developer can and will and override it if it is not in his business interests. She will be forced to go along with the Developer i.e. act in his interests, or she will lose her job. That is reality.
|
I hesitate to weigh in here, but isn't the point of a manager to work for the owner and keep his "company" well oiled and running smoothly? Take over the day-to-day ops and free him up to work on bigger things?