Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeod
warren -there's nothing in your post that's inaccurate from my perspective. But i remember an incident several years ago that i think involved a failed retention pond liner that was on or near a golf course. The developer wanted the local ccd to cover the cost to repair the liner. Janet tutt was able to convince the developer that the cost should be his since the pond was on a championship course he owned. So, i have seen her successfully oppose the developer where money was involved. This doesn't mean she will always do that, but it shows she does not automatically defer to the developer's opinion.
|
the truth here is that the poa was the driving force to get the money refunded from the developer. The developer had no defence, the residents were charged for a liner that was on the developers private property. Actually it was a savvy resident that caught the error. Why the residents were charged for the liner in the first place is still a puzzle to me.