[QUOTE=rubicon;835241]
Let's approach this differently
History tells us that at one point in time most people believed the earth was flat, except the skeptics (deniers) . HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
History tells us that 1950 many Americans believed that all that junk they were launching into space was having an adverse affect on our weather.
Let's suppose the climate modelers are correct. it becomes a bad news -good news scenario. If Bangladesh floods its good news for Greenland which desires to break from Denmark. Profit from those adjoining countries around the melting Arctic would gain profit from recoverable minerals, etc. including the USA
The are two known facts, carbon dioxide has increased due to fossil fuels, and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is a greenhouse gas. what is not known is how much of the Earth's atmosphere will warm into this added carbon. From the surface to 75,000 feet above is the most vulnerable yet scientist have yet to prove heating is occurring there.
Theorist have over stated the variables in their computer model and as years pass and their predictions fail they re-work the numbers to be softer to fit their predictions
What is known for sure is that the Koyoto Protocol Pact failed and renewables still haven't proved cost effective. Every Telsa that comes off the assembly line means taypayers are picking up a heavy credit[/
You need some of my wisdom or some serious drugs to bring you back to reality.
|