Quote:
Originally Posted by janmcn
Why would a seller get to dictate how a building they are selling gets to be used in the future, as long as no zoning violations are involved. We all know that it operated as a restaurant for several years. It was the developer that allowed the building to set empty and deteriorate, thus leading to it's need to be torn down. Nobody knows, at this point, that Ms Tutt wasn't instructed to give a false statement about the building's usage.
|
HOW would it benefit or hurt the developer or not HOW the property was used? I would have to think that the developer TRIED to lease it as he does restaurant facilities that he owns. .....or it doesn't make him any money. He is in the business of building and selling or building and leasing. I doubt he wanted it to
sit empty. How would it hurt or HELP the developer or the community if it were used or not used as a restaurant?
Why do some people always think that it is the bad developer and some people always think it is the good developer? The latter would be me of course.
Up until now I had never encountered anyone who looked down on people in business to make money.
I just can't put my arms around the issue here???????