Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucco
"So what would the ideal alternative to Obamacare look like? It should provide cost-effective care and the quality treatment that Americans deserve. Effective reform should discourage over-insurance that results from the subsidy of so-called Cadillac plans that pay for basic, inexpensive and predictable procedures and have patient co-payments that are too low. Reform should encourage consumers to use America’s scarce health resources efficiently by inducing them to get tests and treatments that are justified instead of those that are selected because they are almost free to the decision-makers. Finally, reform should make health insurance available to the vast majority of Americans, some of whom cannot afford insurance without help.
The Bush 2007 plan achieves these goals"
Read more: Bushcare - Edward Lazear - POLITICO Magazine
Not saying this is a great plan....do not know, but tired of the "bleeding hearts" calling anyone who disagrees with the dishonestly and blatant political nature of this bill...a bill ONLY PASSED with manipulation.....someone who does not care.
To me, that speaks to the character of those making the charge. Fix it ? Why ? How can you "fix it" now ?
|
I respectfully disagree. The AHC has been a winner from its beginning and went into LAW because of its honest statement for the need of healthcare for all and not just the few.