Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone
I hope your son (the Scientist) does not think that Ken Ham has any credibility as a scientist whatsoever. He may think well of Mr. Ham as in being a nice guy, a good golfer, or a gracious host - but not a credible scientist by any means.
The Creation Museum definitely is a one of kind place but to think of it in terms of any reality does not make sense. The museum founder, Ken Ham, believes the Earth is 6,000 years old and will not even look at the facts that disprove that such as the Grand Canyon. Naturally, he and his followers think that evolution is completely bogus.
|
It does make sense. I've been there. Have you? He puts up at every exhibit both views. He uses quotes of well known Scientists over the years. Something you do not see from the other Museums who hold no such view. Ken is not a Ph.D but is very well represented by many who are. He is a brilliant man with a vision and millions have checked out this museum and were impressed as was I. Both sides have the same facts. They just come away with different conclusions. That's basically it in a nutshell. One believes a creator was behind all this evidence and the other side believes it just happened without a creator. Obviously I believe the Creationists have a better answer.