Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - What's your opinion of The Big Bang Theory, from a scientific perspective
View Single Post
 
Old 05-01-2014, 03:05 PM
Villages PL Villages PL is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Belvedere
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon View Post
Hi villages PL: The problem with experts opining on the Big Bang Theory is that the theory keeps evolving as new evidence comes in. An expert once stated that to suggest the viability of the Big Bang Theory as a random event is like suggesting that an exploding building stuffed with letters of the alphabet creates an encyclopedia. In my view such an event as the mathematic precision of the universe requires some sort of intelligent design.
If the letters of the alphabet landed in water and could float, it's only a matter of time before random floating would spell out some words. And given that there might be billions of letters, who knows what you'd get? You might eventually get whole sentences.



Quote:
You also point out that Einstein stated that energy could not be created or destroyed but it can change form. When a person dies energy leaves the body since it cannot be destroyed but can change form does that imply each of us lives elsewhere but in a different form? Is this in fact what many of us call heaven. I believe so. I have had many conversations over the years on this concept and also as to the Big Bang Theory. I have in an earlier thread recently expressed these same thoughts.
What you describe is based on faith, not science.

Quote:
Like all of us I have struggled with these questions of the Big Bang Theory , the after life and of God.

In my humble opinion it is a struggle akin to banging your head against a wall. Intellect can 't get you to the decision on God because the brain is a lazy organ and one needs to look beyond the brain.
Anytime I want to get beyond the brain, I just take a nap.

Quote:
As for scientific discussion on Big Bang theory the concept is so vast and complex with so many pieces of the puzzle missing that the best your going to get from a scientist is an qualified opinion meaning within the certainty of what science has available at that moment in time
That's okay, I accept that. It's science....it is what it is.

Quote:
I lean toward intelligent design because creation while not perfect is so amazing and so resilient.

another aspect is to note how far advanced scientist have come in re-creation with stem cell, DNA, etc. I cannot even imagine what the world will look like one hundred years from now but hoping that my energy rests a hundred years from now with a human being preferable a rich good looking very athletic , very talented male that just makes the ladies swoon...
Well, a book has been written with the following title: "Live Long Enough To Live Forever". The idea is that if you can stay alive for another 10 or 20 years, science will advance to the point where they will be able to keep you alive forever.