Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash
I have posted several times on this thread, but only to refute unfounded or inaccurate or using a kind word "misstatements" by some pro-gun posters.
|
The Crusade to refute the errors of the
pro-gun posters is noble, indeed.
Perhaps you could spare a moment to
correct an error of your own which has been called to your attention, but which you ignore.
-------------------
My statement was simple: " The New Jersey law, previously cited, includes a provision for determining which "smart guns" will be issued to New Jersey police officers."
You responded , quoting my statement verbatim, and (erroneously) said: "Carl, your statement is incorrect."
You went on to cite one section (only) of the law. You then continued to editoralize: "Now Carl, tell me where did you get your information?
You certainly told us a fact that is not a fact. What other of your facts should we believe. I have not checked them and leave it to you to post your evidence of veracity."
I responded to your
patronizing query with a direct,
cut-and-paste quote from the law you cited, showing that a later section of the law contained a
provision for determining which "smart guns" will be issued to New Jersey police officers."
It
provided that the Attorney General could set rules and regulations for the state and local police to carry "smart guns" on duty.
So, you see, my statement was correct, and you were wrong.
A simple acknowledgement of that
fact would be a nice gesture on your part.
.