[renielarson]

Originally Posted by dolpterry

I see the problem, if you sit at the bar and drink then order after 3 you are no longer ordering lunch. If you had ordered before 3 then you would be right. In this case I believe the Manger is correct.

Originally Posted by TomOB

Dolpterry, whether we sat at a table or the bar makes on difference. If they wait until after 3 to ask for our orders that is poor service on their part. We would have ordered all at once before 3 but weren't given the chance.

Originally Posted by CFrance

I went back and read your original post carefully. You said you were ready to order at 3:15. Does that mean what it says, that you weren't ready to order before 3:00 even though you were given lunch menus when you walked in at 2:45? When you sat at the bar and ordered the wine and drink, did you indicate that you were also ordering lunch? I'm just trying to understand exactly what happened.

Although I think that customer service is more important, it could be that they were gearing up for dinner, it was after 3:00, and even though you were given lunch menus, you didn't signal your intention to order lunch when you ordered your drinks.

They were given a Lunch Menu when they arrived. Plain and simple.