Quote:
Originally Posted by Rags123
I am not at all sure what this has remotely to do with the issue at hand. Could you enlighten, at least me, because the relativity escapes me totally !
One, a development with ABSOLUTELY NO RELATIONSHIP to The Villages, and in fact a long time so called "option" to The Villages....the other, a adjunct to The Villages, built by The Villages for a specific purpose which is Villages related.
I would love to hear more on this theory !
|
The theory is that people are outraged that Stonecresters might be using the golf cart paths without paying the monthly amenity fee, but when the developer provides these same amenities without an amenity fee to others, there is only silence. Where is the outrage over the hypocrisy?