All this veterans rights, holding ponds, denial of access to the elderly is smoke screen. The Stonecrest advocates are trying to use a trumped up moral/fairness rationale. Motive aside, the developer is clearly viewing this as a legal issue and holds the high ground and all the horsepower. Calling in some minor league former polititian to battle the immense clout of the developer is actually laughable. The gate will stay. The debate will have a long life, but the gate will stay.
Last edited by TheVillageChicken; 06-05-2014 at 10:48 AM.
|