Quote:
Originally Posted by redwitch
I find it extremely frightening. What next -- privately held corporations will once again be allowed to discriminate against homosexuals, people of color, women, etc.? Oh,wait, this ruling does allow a company to discriminate against women since birth control is not a male issue.
|
How do you get from a privately owned family business which is held only by a few family members [rather than is publicly traded] and who provides insurance to its employees for 16 of 20 contraceptive measures to this being discriminatory against women?
How do you even question the potential to discriminate against the laundry list of people you cited when THIS case is about 4 forms of contraception?
__________________
Not sure if I have free time...or if I just forgot everything I was supposed to do!