[njbchbum]

Originally Posted by Warren Kiefer

Here are a couple of the problems with the stupid Supreme Court decision..First, the insurance plan provided to Hobby Lobby employees has coverage for vasectomies ( a form of birth control) yet they will now deny certain birth control methods for women. Is this not discrimination ???
Secondly and more important is the fact that there are thousand of religous sects in America who own busineses. Some sects are major religous groups that oppose any medical intervention in any form. These are interventions such as vaccinations. blood transfusions, transplants, and surgeries. Does this decision now allow these religious owned businesses to now deny coverage for such medical procedures??
And thirdly, the "Decision" uses th term "sincerely religous" owners of specific businesses. Whe is to decide who meets this provision.
I can forsee a couple of owners suddenly becoming "saved" over night.

1. Vasectomies do not have the potential to cause abortions as do the 4 specific contraceptives sited by Hobby Lobby.
2. Re vaccinations, etc - the decision specifically states that is does not in any way deal with those issues.
3. I am confident the judicial system would have to deal with any allegation of "sincerely religious" AS WELL AS the other "numerous qualifiers" set forth in the decision.
What owners do you see "suddenly becoming "saved" over night." who meet the criteria set forth in the decision?