This is not rocket science. Hobby Lobby doesn't want to be involved in paying for abortion-inducing forms of birth control. Vasectomies are not abort-inducing. Hobby Lobby has and will continue to pay for non abortion-inducing forms of birth control. Why is it so difficult to see the distinction? This is not really all that difficult to understand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Kiefer
Here are a couple of the problems with the stupid Supreme Court decision..First, the insurance plan provided to Hobby Lobby employees has coverage for vasectomies ( a form of birth control) yet they will now deny certain birth control methods for women. Is this not discrimination ???
Secondly and more important is the fact that there are thousand of religous sects in America who own busineses. Some sects are major religous groups that oppose any medical intervention in any form   . These are interventions such as vaccinations. blood transfusions, transplants, and surgeries. Does this decision now allow these religious owned businesses to now deny coverage for such medical procedures??
And thirdly, the "Decision" uses th term "sincerely religous" owners of specific businesses. Whe is to decide who meets this provision.
I can forsee a couple of owners suddenly becoming "saved" over night. |